In a stunning courtroom showdown that has reverberated across the globe, a furious judge delivered a decisive blow to Prince Harry’s plea for taxpayer-funded security, declaring, “You can’t use taxpayer money!” This explosive moment unfolded during a contentious hearing, where Harry, reportedly under the influence of Meghan Markle, insisted he deserved state-funded protection despite stepping back from his royal duties in 2020.

The courtroom was charged with tension as the judge vehemently questioned the legitimacy of Harry’s demands, emphasizing that British citizens should not bear the financial burden for someone who has renounced his royal status. The prince’s multi-million dollar deals with Netflix and Spotify only added fuel to the fire, raising eyebrows about his entitlement.

Critics have long accused the couple of a delusional sense of privilege, and this latest incident has reignited fierce public debate over the responsibilities of non-working royals. Meghan’s role in pushing Harry towards this legal battle has drawn scrutiny, as she continues to portray herself as a victim of the monarchy while profiting from her royal connections.

The courtroom drama has exposed a troubling pattern: wherever Meghan is involved, controversy follows. From her infamous Oprah Winfrey interview filled with inconsistencies to ongoing feuds with the British press, her influence appears to complicate Harry’s legal and personal decisions. Former palace staff have accused her of bullying, claims she denies, but the internal investigation’s findings remain shrouded in secrecy.

As the judge’s powerful rebuke echoed through the courtroom, the message was unmistakable: if you walk away from the crown, you must also relinquish its perks. This courtroom clash serves as a stark reminder of the consequences of royal entitlement and the public’s unwavering demand for accountability. The fallout from this hearing will undoubtedly resonate for some time, leaving Harry and Meghan to grapple with the reality of their choices.