In a stunning display of dissent, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has unleashed a scathing critique of his fellow justices, accusing them of fabricating due process rights out of thin air. This fiery rebuke comes in the wake of a contentious ruling regarding the death penalty case of Reuben Gutierrez, who has been on death row for 26 years. Thomas argues that the court is distorting the 14th Amendment’s due process clause to create new, unfounded liberties that undermine the integrity of the legal system.

Thomas’s dissent highlights the absurdity of allowing Gutierrez to challenge Texas’s long-standing procedures for post-conviction relief, asserting that the Constitution does not mandate such processes. He questions why the court would stay an execution after a quarter-century, suggesting that the focus should be on the brutal murder of Escolastika Harrison, not on procedural delays. “Is he developing a nuclear weapon?” Thomas provocatively asks, alluding to the farcical nature of the legal battles that have ensued.

In a parallel ruling, the Supreme Court has also dealt a significant blow to Planned Parenthood, allowing states like South Carolina to block Medicaid funds from going to the abortion giant. This 6-3 decision, penned by Justice Neil Gorsuch, is seen as a major victory for conservative groups, who argue that taxpayer dollars should not support abortion services.

As the nation grapples with these landmark decisions, Thomas’s fierce dissent serves as a clarion call for a return to constitutional fundamentals, rejecting the expansion of rights that he believes are not grounded in law. With the stakes higher than ever, the implications of these rulings will resonate throughout the judicial landscape, igniting fierce debates on due process and the role of government in individual rights.