In a fiery exchange during a recent Judiciary Committee hearing, Texas Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett confronted her GOP colleagues over their apparent misunderstanding of the U.S. Constitution, specifically regarding due process rights. Crockett passionately reminded her counterparts that the Fifth Amendment guarantees due process to all individuals on U.S. soil, including immigrants, a point that seemed to elude many in the room.

The debate escalated when California Congressman Kevin Kiley questioned Crockett’s assertion, suggesting that due process might not apply equally to those who enter the country illegally. Crockett, undeterred, articulated that the Constitution does not differentiate between citizens and non-citizens when it comes to fundamental rights. “If you are on our soil, you are guaranteed due process,” she declared, emphasizing the importance of this constitutional guarantee.

Despite her compelling arguments, the GOP’s resistance to acknowledging these rights was palpable. Crockett’s remarks highlighted a growing concern about the erosion of constitutional protections, particularly as discussions around immigration and citizenship intensify. She pointed out that historical precedents, including the Supreme Court’s rulings, affirm that due process is an inherent right for all persons, regardless of their immigration status.

As tensions rose, Crockett’s insistence on the need for due process resonated beyond the hearing room, signaling a critical moment in the ongoing national discourse surrounding immigration law and civil rights. The stakes have never been higher, as the fundamental principles of justice and equality hang in the balance. With the GOP seemingly at odds with constitutional tenets, the implications of this debate could shape the future of American democracy itself.