In a dramatic escalation of legal tensions, former President Donald Trump is demanding the immediate dismissal of an immigration injunction issued by Judge Zenus, an Obama appointee, regarding the case of illegal immigrant Abrego Garcia. This urgent plea comes as the Department of Justice argues that the case has become moot, asserting that Garcia has already been returned to the U.S. and thus, any claims for his return are no longer valid.

In a scathing legal motion filed directly with the court, Trump’s administration contends that the plaintiffs, led by Garcia and his family, have received the relief they sought, rendering further judicial intervention unnecessary. The DOJ’s motion underscores that the court lacks jurisdiction to continue its involvement since the alleged grievances have been resolved. “You can’t bring Kilmar home again; he’s already in the United States,” the motion states, highlighting the absurdity of continuing a case that has effectively reached its conclusion.

The backdrop to this legal battle is fraught with allegations of gang affiliations and violent behavior linked to Garcia, who has been accused of significant criminal activity, including human trafficking. Trump’s team argues that the ongoing prosecution of Garcia for multiple felonies further complicates the plaintiffs’ claims, insisting that Judge Zenus must now dismiss the case outright.

As the political and legal ramifications unfold, the situation is intensifying, with Trump’s administration pushing back against what they deem judicial overreach. The stakes are high, not only for the individuals involved but also for the broader implications on U.S. immigration policy and judicial authority. The urgency of this motion reflects a critical moment in the ongoing battle over immigration enforcement and judicial power, with both sides gearing up for what could be a pivotal confrontation in the courts.